General Discussion

Although the purpose of this website is to provide examples of arguments for use in critical thinking exercises, I thought it best to write out some of the general themes associated with logic and critical thinking. I’m hardly the most qualified person to do so, but I do have a thought or two on the subject. Anyway, it gives me a chance to work out some of the quirks in my own approach to the subject by at least spelling them out as clearly as possible. I’ll include the themes covered thus far as I go.

GENERAL THEMES

Helpful Principles of Reasoning.

– General Principles (Burden of Proof, Ockham’s Razor, Principle of Charity).

– Selected Fallacies (ad ignorantiam, circular argument).

FALLACIES

Ad Hominem Fallacy.

– Critical Ad Hominems (abusive, circumstantial, and tu quoque).

– Fallacious Appeals to Authority (anonymous authority, authority by association, out of field authority, decontextualized authority, non-authorities, problematic authority).

The Negs of Net Logic.

Concern Troll, Gish Gallop, Godwin’s Law, Philosophy Dude-Bro, Poe’s Law, Rule 34, Schrodinger’s Asshole, Tone Policing.

The Palliative Rejoinder.

The Straw Man Fallacy.

Bale of Hyperbole, Misplaced Literalism, Straw Rule, The Whipping Boy, Uncharitable Interpretation.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s